Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund claim of service tax paid on input services used in export of goods, particularly GTA Service and Business Auxiliary Service, required fresh adjudication in light of the subsequent appellate order and supporting documents.
Analysis: The refund was originally denied for non-fulfilment of conditions under Notification No. 41/2007-ST. The later appellate order had allowed similar claims after considering the documents and evidence, and that order had been accepted by the Department. In view of this subsequent development, the matter required reconsideration by the Original Authority on the basis of the earlier observations and the material placed on record.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for decision afresh; the appeals were allowed by way of remand.