Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether explosives used in mines for extracting limestone, though not used within the factory premises, were eligible as inputs for availing Cenvat credit under the relevant excise rules.
Analysis: The Court noted that the Supreme Court had initially held in Jaypee Rewa Cement that inputs used outside the factory premises could still qualify for Modvat credit. It then noted that the earlier contrary view in J.K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd. was reconsidered by a three-judge Bench in Vikram Cement, which approved the Jaypee Rewa Cement principle and held that the Cenvat scheme continued the Modvat position. On that basis, the Tribunal's view in favour of credit was found consistent with the governing law.
Conclusion: The explosives were eligible inputs for Cenvat credit even though they were used in mines outside the factory premises, and the revenue's challenge failed.