Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the advance received in respect of flats proposed on the 7th floor was taxable in the assessment year when the building plan for that floor had not been approved and the agreements had become uncertain.
Analysis: Revenue from real estate sales is recognized only when the seller transfers the significant risks and rewards of ownership, retains no effective control, and no significant uncertainty exists as to the consideration. On the facts, approval existed only up to the 6th floor, further approval for the 7th floor had not been obtained, and the agreements for flats 701 and 702 were affected by the uncertainty arising from non-approval. The purchasers also disputed payments, and one agreement had already been cancelled while the other was under litigation. In these circumstances, the advance could not be treated as accrued income for the year in question.
Conclusion: The addition made by treating the advance for flats 701 and 702 as current year income was unsustainable and was deleted.