Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the intermediate product used captively in the manufacture of the exempt final product was liable to Central Excise duty, or stood exempt under Notification No. 6/2003-C.E.
Analysis: The intermediate goods were admittedly consumed within the factory during the relevant period. The exemption notification covered intermediate products used within the factory for manufacture of drugs with effect from 1-3-2003, and this position was not disputed by the Revenue. In view of the applicable exemption, the question of marketability did not require examination for deciding the duty liability in these appeals.
Conclusion: The intermediate product was not liable to Central Excise duty and the Revenue's appeals failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an intermediate product is captively consumed and is covered by an applicable exemption notification, duty cannot be demanded notwithstanding the Revenue's contention on marketability.