Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Sr. No. 143 of List A of Notification No. 25/99-Cus. could be denied on the ground that the imported solder plated copper covered steel wire was not shown to be of non-alloy steel and on the ground of alleged mis-match with the end use stated by the Revenue.
Analysis: The denial of benefit under Entry 87 was found unsustainable because the notification was not treated as an end-use based exemption and the goods only had to answer the description in the entry. As regards Sr. No. 143, the entry covered the goods used in the manufacture of plastic film capacitors, which matched the appellant's manufacturing activity. The only objection sustained by the Revenue was that the goods were not shown to be non-alloy steel, but that ground was not taken in the original order. In any event, the Revenue adduced no evidence to show that the solder plated copper covered steel wire was of alloy steel variety, and it could have had the goods tested if it wanted to dispute the description.
Conclusion: The benefit of Sr. No. 143 of List A of Notification No. 25/99-Cus. could not be denied, and the appellant was entitled to the exemption.