Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        2017 (4) TMI 150 - AT - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal upholds fines for Excise Duty violations, reduces penalties, releases fabrics, dismisses appeals The Tribunal upheld penalties and fines imposed on M/s Kanchan Processors Pvt Ltd and associated parties for Central Excise Duty violations but reduced ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Tribunal upholds fines for Excise Duty violations, reduces penalties, releases fabrics, dismisses appeals

                              The Tribunal upheld penalties and fines imposed on M/s Kanchan Processors Pvt Ltd and associated parties for Central Excise Duty violations but reduced the amounts. Confiscation of unaccounted processed man-made fabrics was partially overturned, with some fabrics released due to measurement errors. The Tribunal dismissed appeals against the Order-in-Appeal reducing penalties and setting aside some penalties. The Order-in-Appeal was sustained, with modifications reducing penalties for some parties and dismissing others' appeals.




                              Issues Involved:
                              1. Demand of Central Excise Duty and penalties imposed on M/s Kanchan Processors Pvt Ltd and associated parties.
                              2. Confiscation of unaccounted processed man-made fabrics (PMMF) and imposition of penalties.
                              3. Appeals against Order-in-Original and Order-in-Appeal by both the assessee and Revenue.

                              Detailed Analysis:

                              Issue 1: Demand of Central Excise Duty and Penalties
                              The judgment addresses the appeals filed by M/s Kanchan Processors Pvt Ltd and associated parties against the Order-in-Original dated 26.02.2009, which confirmed a demand of Central Excise Duty amounting to Rs. 86,01,121/- along with interest. Equivalent penalties were imposed on Kanchan Processors Pvt Ltd, M/s Kanchan Wooltex Pvt Ltd, and individual directors Shri Nilesh Bangar and Shri Jayesh Bangar. The Tribunal, after reviewing the case records and submissions, upheld the penalties but reduced the amounts imposed on M/s Kanchan Wooltex Pvt Ltd to Rs. 17,20,242/- and on Shri Nilesh Bangar and Shri Jayesh Bangar to Rs. 8,60,121/- each, considering the totality of facts and circumstances.

                              Issue 2: Confiscation of Unaccounted PMMF
                              The case began with the confiscation of 1,83,842.80 meters of PMMF found unaccounted during a surprise visit by DGCEI officers, suspected to be intended for clandestine removal without duty payment. The Commissioner (Appeals) reviewed the discrepancies and ordered the release of 85,654.74 meters of fabrics, giving the benefit of the doubt due to apparent errors in stock measurement. However, the Tribunal found no justification to overturn the confiscation of the remaining 98,190.06 meters of fabrics valued at Rs. 47,13,123/- and upheld the penalties and fines imposed.

                              Issue 3: Appeals Against Order-in-Original and Order-in-Appeal
                              The Tribunal first addressed the appeals filed by M/s Kanchan Processors Pvt Ltd and the cross-appeal by the Revenue against the Order-in-Appeal dated 19.12.2008. The Commissioner (Appeals) had reduced the penalty on M/s Kanchan Processors Pvt Ltd from Rs. 6 lakhs to Rs. 2 lakhs and set aside the penalty on Shri Nilesh Bangar. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)' decision, dismissing both the assessee's and Revenue's appeals, stating that the Commissioner (Appeals) had rightly reduced the penalties and there was no justification for further relief or for restoring the original penalties.

                              Conclusion:
                              The Tribunal sustained the Order-in-Appeal dated 19.12.2008, dismissing the appeals filed by M/s Kanchan Processors Pvt Ltd and the Revenue. It modified the Order-in-Original dated 26.02.2009, reducing the penalties on M/s Kanchan Wooltex Pvt Ltd, Shri Jayesh Bangar, and Shri Nilesh Bangar, while dismissing the appeal by M/s Kanchan Processors Pvt Ltd. The appeals by M/s Kanchan Wooltex Pvt Ltd, Shri Jayesh Bangar, and Shri Nilesh Bangar were partly allowed, reducing their penalties as specified.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found