Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        2017 (3) TMI 1439 - AT - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal classifies products as Ayurvedic, labelling process constitutes manufacture, penalties confirmed, appeals dismissed. The Tribunal classified 'Keshyog Oil and Keshyog Herbal Powder Hair Wash/Shampoo' as Ayurvedic medicines under Chapter 30. The processes of labelling and ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                          Tribunal classifies products as Ayurvedic, labelling process constitutes manufacture, penalties confirmed, appeals dismissed.

                          The Tribunal classified "Keshyog Oil and Keshyog Herbal Powder Hair Wash/Shampoo" as Ayurvedic medicines under Chapter 30. The processes of labelling and packing by the appellants were deemed to constitute manufacture, attracting Central Excise duty. Penalties on the appellants were confirmed, while penalties on individuals were set aside due to insufficient justification. Appeals by both Revenue and the assessee against the Commissioner (Appeals) order were dismissed.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Correct classification of the impugned goods.
                          2. Duty liability of the impugned goods.
                          3. Whether the processes undertaken by the appellants amount to manufacture.
                          4. Imposition of penalties on the appellants and individuals.

                          Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Correct Classification of the Impugned Goods:
                          The primary issue was whether "Keshyog Oil and Keshyog Herbal Powder Hair Wash/Shampoo" should be classified as Ayurvedic medicine under Chapter 30 or as cosmetic/toilet preparations under Chapter 33. The appellants argued that the products should be classified under Chapter 30 since they are manufactured according to ingredients listed in the Ayurvedic text "Bhav Prakash Nighantu" and are recognized by the Ministry of Ayush, Government of India. The Tribunal noted that the products were approved by the State Drug Authorities as Ayurvedic medicine and the packaging identified them as such. Citing the Tribunal's decision in CCE, Chandigarh vs. Saini Hair Products, it was concluded that the products are rightly classifiable as Ayurvedic medicines under Chapter 30.

                          2. Duty Liability of the Impugned Goods:
                          The Original Authority confirmed the Central Excise duty of Rs. 1,36,72,354/- on M/s GTM Teleshopping Pvt. Ltd./M/s Global Tele Mall, along with equal penalties. It was argued by the appellants that their activities did not amount to manufacture and hence no duty was liable. However, the Tribunal upheld the duty liability, stating that the processes undertaken by the appellants amounted to manufacture as per Note 6 of Chapter 30, which includes labelling, re-labelling, and repacking from bulk to retail packs.

                          3. Whether the Processes Undertaken by the Appellants Amount to Manufacture:
                          The Tribunal examined whether the activities of labelling, re-labelling, and packing undertaken by the appellants constituted manufacture. It was found that the appellants received packed and sealed bottles, which were then labelled, packed into combo packs, and made marketable. These activities were deemed to constitute manufacture under Note 6 of Chapter 30, which specifies that such processes render the product marketable to the consumer and therefore amount to manufacture. The Tribunal dismissed the appellants' reliance on case laws that were based on different facts.

                          4. Imposition of Penalties on the Appellants and Individuals:
                          Penalties were imposed on various individuals, including the Director of GTM and the Proprietor of M/s Ishguru High Tech Natural Care Products. The Tribunal set aside the penalties on individuals, noting that the Original Authority did not provide sufficient justification for imposing these penalties. Specifically, the penalties on Shri Anuj Agarwal and Shri Pranayadutta Shukla were set aside due to lack of elaboration and justification in the original order. The Tribunal also dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the reduction of penalties by the Commissioner (Appeals).

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal concluded that the impugned goods are to be classified as Ayurvedic medicines under Chapter 30. The processes undertaken by the appellants, including labelling and packing, amount to manufacture, thereby attracting Central Excise duty. The penalties imposed on the assessees/appellants were confirmed, while the penalties on individuals were set aside. Appeals by the Revenue and the assessee against the Commissioner (Appeals) order were dismissed. The judgment was pronounced in open court on 01/03/2017.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found