Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the entire amortised reduction in the value of closing stock had to be treated as written off inputs requiring reversal of CENVAT credit, or whether credit reversal was confined only to the inputs actually consumed for research and development purposes.
Analysis: The value reduced in the balance sheet comprised not only material inputs but also other expenditure such as salary and wages, power and fuel, factory overheads, depreciation and interest incurred over a period for research and development. The appellants had already reversed credit on the raw-material component, and their explanation was supported by statements and a statutory auditor certificate. No contrary evidence was produced by the Revenue to show that the entire reduced amount represented inputs on which credit had been taken.
Conclusion: The demand for reversal of credit on the entire amortised value was not sustainable, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeals succeeded with consequential relief in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the reduced book value includes both input cost and other non-input expenditure, CENVAT credit reversal cannot be demanded on the entire amount in the absence of evidence that the whole sum represents inputs on which credit was availed.