Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cheque taken from the petitioner during inspection was obtained coercively and, if so, whether the respondent was bound to return it.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the cheque represented a voluntary payment towards tax or had been extracted during inspection without a legally enforceable demand. Rule 23 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Rules, 2007 governs the modes of payment of tax and other amounts due under the Act. On the correspondence between the parties, the petitioner had consistently asserted that the cheque was forcibly obtained and that the liability itself had not attained finality through legal process. In the absence of an established liability, the demand for retaining the cheque could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The cheque was not shown to have been given voluntarily, and the respondent was directed to return it. The respondent was left free to proceed under the TNVAT Act if any amount was lawfully found due.
Ratio Decidendi: A cheque collected without a legally enforceable liability and without voluntary consent cannot be retained by the revenue authority, and tax recovery must proceed only in accordance with law.