Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were liable to be waived under Section 80 on the ground of bona fide belief and reasonable cause.
Analysis: The tax liability was not contested, but the appellant's role was found to be that of an intermediary in the distribution chain rather than that of a local cable operator transmitting signals or an MSO receiving satellite signals. In view of the scope of activities and the statutory linkage of cable operator and cable service definitions to the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995, the appellant's belief that the activity did not attract tax was treated as bona fide. On the facts, the case was considered fit for invoking Section 80 to waive penalties.
Conclusion: The penalties were set aside under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 and the appeal succeeded to that extent.