Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appointment of a retired officer of the Commercial Taxes Department as Member (Accounts) of the Commercial Taxes Tribunal was invalid for want of the requisite experience in administration of accounts or financial management and for alleged bias in favour of the Revenue.
Analysis: The eligibility clause in Section 9(3)(c) of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 was construed according to its ordinary meaning, as the expressions "administration of accounts" and "financial management" were not defined. Experience gained in the Commercial Taxes Department was held to be relevant to applied accounts and assessment work, and the Court rejected the contention that the clause had to be read ejusdem generis with clauses (a) and (b). On the question of bias, the Court applied the settled test of real likelihood of bias and held that mere prior service in the Commercial Taxes Department did not create a reasonable apprehension of prejudice; no pecuniary or personal interest was shown, and a statutory tribunal member is expected to act fairly and without bias.
Conclusion: The appointee was held eligible under Section 9(3)(c) and the challenge based on alleged departmental bias was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory eligibility clause is expressed in ordinary terms and is not defined in the Act, prior departmental experience may satisfy the requirement if it reasonably relates to the statutory function, and prior service in the department, without more, does not establish disqualifying bias unless a real likelihood of bias is shown.