Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported goods, described as intravenous cannulae and tubing for long-term use as disposable solution infusion sets, were covered by Sl. No. 42 of Part B of Notification No. 208/1981-Cus. dated 22.9.1981 and entitled to exemption.
Analysis: The notification entry exempted only disposable and non-disposable cannulae of the specified description. The goods imported were not individual cannulae but a set comprising intravenous cannulae and tubing. On the bill of entry and the nature of the import, the imported article fell outside the scope of the exemption entry, which did not extend to complete sets or tubing. The claimant also failed to discharge the burden of proving that the goods satisfied the exemption description.
Conclusion: The imported goods were not covered by the exemption entry and the claim for exemption was rejected.