Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether infusion sets, scalp vein sets and BT sets were eligible for exemption as "intravenous cannulae and tubing for long term use" under the relevant exemption notification.
Analysis: The items were found to consist essentially of a cannula in the form of a needle with a tube. Earlier decisions had already treated scalp vein sets as falling within the expression "intravenous cannulae and tubing for long term use". The expression "long term use" was understood to mean that the device is capable of remaining in use for the relevant period of fluid delivery, and not that it must be repeatedly used. The disposable or one-time-use character of the items was held to be a hygienic restriction and not inconsistent with long-term use. The lower appellate authority had overturned the original finding without examining the samples and without adequate basis.
Conclusion: The items were held to be eligible for exemption under the notification, and the assessee's claim succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the exemption benefit was restored in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For exemption under a notification using the expression "for long term use", the decisive test is whether the goods are designed to remain functionally usable for the required duration, and a disposable or single-use character does not by itself negate long-term use.