Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the eligibility of Modvat/Cenvat credit on CRSS coils, HR coils and copper cathode depended on proof that the items were used as inputs or capital goods in the manufacture of the final products.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the actual use of the goods in the manufacturing process. The appellant asserted that the coils were used to fabricate cover boxes for annealing furnace furniture and that copper cathode was used in the conductor rolls shop for copper coating of rolls, thereby having direct nexus with manufacture. The lower authority had rejected the claim for want of supporting evidence and for not being satisfied that the goods answered the description of inputs or capital goods. The Tribunal found that either the relevant details of use had not been properly placed before the lower authority or the manufacturing process had not been adequately examined. Since eligibility depended on the factual use of the items in manufacture, the matter required fresh examination after considering the material to be produced by the appellant.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for de novo decision on the eligibility of credit after examining the use of the goods.