Transfer of right to use brand name not established; brand franchise fees were held outside the sales tax net.

Sales tax was held not leviable on brand franchise fees received from contract bottling units for beer manufacture because the arrangement did not amount to a transfer of the right to use the brand name or trade mark. The units manufactured under the assessee's specifications and control, without independent or unrestricted rights over the brand or effective commercial exploitation. The receipt was treated as consideration for services rather than a sale of goods, and simultaneous levy as both sale and service was excluded by the rule against double taxation. The tax, penalty and interest were therefore unsustainable, and the receipts were held outside the sales tax net.

---

---

Issues: Whether sales tax was leviable on the amount received as brand franchise fees from contract bottling units for manufacture of beer.

Analysis: The decisive question was whether the arrangement amounted to a transfer of the right to use the brand name or trade mark so as to constitute a taxable sale under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. The arrangement showed that the contract bottling units manufactured beer on the assessee's specifications, under the assessee's control, and for the assessee's customers and price. The units did not acquire independent or unrestricted rights over the brand name, nor effective control for full commercial exploitation. The receipt was also treated as consideration for a service and not as a sale of goods, and the law against double taxation excluded simultaneous levy as both sale and service.

Conclusion: The brand franchise fee was not liable to sales tax and the levy of tax, penalty and interest was unsustainable; the issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.

Final Conclusion: The petitions failed and the challenge to the Tribunal's order was rejected, as the receipts from the contract bottling units were held outside the sales tax net.

Ratio Decidendi: Sales tax is attracted only when there is an actual transfer of the right to use goods, and where the alleged user has no independent or effective control over the brand name and acts only under the owner's directions, the receipt is not taxable as a sale.

---