Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the recipient of commission agent service from a foreign service provider having no office in India was liable to service tax only from 1-1-2005 and whether the matter required remand for quantification of liability.
Analysis: The service recipient had already deposited the entire service tax along with interest. The Tribunal followed the Larger Bench view that where the service provider is not resident in India and has no office in India, the recipient becomes liable to service tax only with effect from 1-1-2005 under Notification No. 36/2004. In view of that settled position, the appellant accepted liability from that date onwards and sought remand only for computation of the duty liability. The question of penalty was not finally adjudicated and was left open to be raised before the original authority.
Conclusion: The recipient's liability to service tax was recognised only from 1-1-2005, and the matter was remanded for quantification.