Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deemed credit was admissible on grey fabrics received for processing and falling under Chapter Heading 5207.20, in view of Notification No. 6/2002-C.E. (N.T.) dated 01.03.2002 and Circular No. 702/18/2003-CX dated 13.03.2003.
Analysis: The authorities below had allowed credit relying on the Board's circular, which clarified that although grey fabrics were not specifically included as declared inputs in the notification, they were made out of duty-paid yarn/fibres that were declared inputs and had suffered excise duty. The circular further clarified that deemed credit is admissible even where the declared inputs are not used directly in manufacture, but are contained in the final product. On that basis, the grey fabrics were treated as eligible for deemed credit.
Conclusion: The deemed credit availed on grey fabrics was admissible and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a Board circular clarifies that goods manufactured from duty-paid declared inputs remain eligible for deemed credit even if the inputs are contained in, rather than directly used in, the final product, the credit cannot be disallowed merely because the intermediate goods are not expressly named in the notification.