Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty could be demanded under Rule 3(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 on clearance of worn out parts of capital goods when the goods were not removed as such.
Analysis: Rule 3(4) applies only when inputs or capital goods on which CENVAT credit has been taken are removed as such from the factory. The goods in question were admittedly used capital goods and only their worn out parts were cleared without payment of duty. Since the statutory condition of removal as such was not satisfied, the provision could not be invoked to demand duty.
Conclusion: The demand was not sustainable under Rule 3(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 and the assessee succeeded.