Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit originally taken on capital goods was required to be reversed when the capital goods, after being used in the factory for several years, were cleared as scrap on payment of duty on transaction value.
Analysis: The capital goods were not removed in the condition in which they were received, but after having been used in the factory for about 7 to 8 years. The governing rule required reversal only where capital goods were removed "as such". The Board circulars relied upon by the earlier decision also indicated that duty on removed capital goods was to be determined after allowing depreciation. The Tribunal further relied on its earlier decisions holding that removal of used capital goods does not amount to removal "as such" and therefore does not trigger reversal of the full credit originally availed.
Conclusion: The credit originally availed was not required to be reversed and the duty paid on transaction value was held to be correct; the appeal was decided in favour of the assessee.