Tribunal overturns penalties for late service tax payment, citing timely rectification.

The tribunal held that penalties imposed on the appellant for failure to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism were unwarranted. It was noted that the appellant rectified the non-payment before the show cause notice was issued. Relying on a precedent from the Karnataka High Court, the tribunal ruled that penalties cannot be imposed if the service tax is paid before the notice. As a result, the penalties were set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any necessary consequential reliefs.

---

---

Issues:
Failure to pay service tax under reverse charge mechanism, irregular availment of credit, imposition of penalties.

Analysis:
The case involved the appellant, a service provider under the category of Architect Services, who availed input services from a foreign company without paying service tax under the reverse charge mechanism. The appellant rectified the non-payment by paying service tax along with interest in 2009, after an audit objection highlighted the issue. A show cause notice was issued, alleging non-payment of service tax and irregular availment of credit due to insufficient invoice details. The demand, interest, and penalties were confirmed after adjudication, which the appellant appealed.

During the appeal, the appellant argued that the service tax was paid promptly upon identification of the issue, and as per Section 73(3), no show cause notice should have been issued once the payment was made. On the other hand, the respondent contended that the appellant failed to reflect the payment to the foreign company in their service tax returns, justifying the issuance of the show cause notice and imposition of penalties.

The tribunal noted that the appellant had indeed paid the alleged short service tax and rectified the irregular credit before the show cause notice was issued. Citing a precedent from the Honorable Karnataka High Court, which ruled that penalties cannot be imposed if the service tax is paid before the notice, the tribunal held that the penalties imposed were unwarranted. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the penalties and allowed the appeal with any necessary consequential reliefs.

---