Tribunal decision: Revenue appeal partly allowed, set off disallowed, payment disallowance upheld

The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal, setting aside the allowance of set off of unabsorbed depreciation loss of the amalgamating company due to failure to meet the three-calendar-year business requirement. The deletion of disallowance for belated payment of employees' contributions towards P.F. and E.S.I. was upheld based on Supreme Court precedents. The addition on account of short-term capital gain under section 50C was remanded for verification of the nature of the property. The Cross Objection of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Set off of unabsorbed depreciation loss of the amalgamating company.
2. Disallowance of belated payment of employees' contribution towards P.F. and E.S.I.
3. Addition on account of short-term capital gain by applying the provisions of section 50C.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Set off of unabsorbed depreciation loss of the amalgamating company:

The Revenue challenged the ld. CIT(Appeals) for allowing the assessee to set off the unabsorbed depreciation loss of the amalgamating company, amounting to Rs. 84,22,538/-, against its income. The Assessing Officer disallowed this set off, asserting that the amalgamating company was not engaged in business for three or more years as required by section 72A of the Income Tax Act. The amalgamating company, incorporated on 13.09.2001, was considered not to have commenced business until 31.03.2001. The ld. CIT(Appeals), however, accepted the assessee's argument that the amalgamating company was engaged in setting up a plant from 2001-02, which involved significant capital investment, and thus had been in business for over three years by the effective amalgamation date of 01.04.2004.

Upon review, it was observed that the amalgamating company placed its first machinery order on 13.10.2001. The Tribunal clarified that the term "three or more years" used in section 72A refers to calendar years, not previous years. Given that the amalgamating company was not in business for three calendar years by 01.04.2004, the condition was not met. Therefore, the assessee was not entitled to set off the brought forward loss, and the order of the ld. CIT(Appeals) was set aside, restoring the Assessing Officer's decision.

2. Disallowance of belated payment of employees' contribution towards P.F. and E.S.I.:

The Revenue's second issue involved the deletion by the ld. CIT(Appeals) of the disallowance of Rs. 77,829/- made by the Assessing Officer for late payment of employees' contribution towards P.F. and E.S.I. The payments were made after the statutory due dates but before the filing of the return. Both parties agreed that the issue was covered by the Supreme Court decisions in CIT vs. Alom Extrusions Limited and CIT vs. Vinay Cement Limited, which ruled in favor of the assessee. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the ld. CIT(Appeals)'s order, dismissing the Revenue's ground.

3. Addition on account of short-term capital gain by applying the provisions of section 50C:

The assessee challenged the addition of Rs. 39,07,500/- made by the Assessing Officer under section 50C, which was upheld by the ld. CIT(Appeals). The Assessing Officer had adopted the stamp duty value of Rs. 3,87,03,700/- as the deemed sale consideration, leading to a higher short-term capital gain computation. The assessee argued that the property transferred was booking rights, not land and building, and thus section 50C did not apply.

The Tribunal noted that this contention was raised for the first time and agreed to remand the issue to the Assessing Officer for verification. The Assessing Officer was tasked with examining the nature of the property and determining the applicability of section 50C. Thus, the Cross Objection of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.

Conclusion:

The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed, and the Cross Objection of the assessee was treated as allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal's order was pronounced on September 7th, 2016.

---