Recovery under Section 11A cannot be used to reclaim excess duty paid on inputs; demand and penalty fail.

Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applies only to duty not levied, not paid, short-levied, short-paid, or erroneously refunded. Where duty on clearance of inputs as such had admittedly been paid in excess, the provision could not be invoked to recover that excess amount. The notice and demand were therefore unsustainable, and the penalty could not survive once the underlying demand failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether duty paid in excess on clearance of inputs as such under Rule 57F(3) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 could be recovered under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and whether the demand and penalty could be sustained.

Analysis: Section 11A applies where duty has not been levied, not paid, short-levied, short-paid, or erroneously refunded. On the facts found, the duty on removal of inputs as such had admittedly been paid in excess, and the case did not involve any short-payment or non-payment of duty. Since excess duty payment is outside the statutory field of recovery under Section 11A, the notice and consequent demand could not be maintained. The penalty attached to the unsustainable demand also could not survive.

Conclusion: Section 11A could not be invoked to recover the excess duty paid, and the demand and penalty were not sustainable.

Ratio Decidendi: Recovery under Section 11A is confined to duty not paid, short-paid, or otherwise specifically covered by that provision, and it cannot be used to reclaim duty admittedly paid in excess.

---