Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rejection of refund of excess service tax paid on GTA services under Notification No. 32/2004-S.T. was liable to be sustained, or the matter required remand for fresh examination of eligibility.
Analysis: The refund claim rested on the exemption under Notification No. 32/2004-S.T., which permitted tax to be paid only on 25% of the gross amount subject to prescribed conditions regarding non-availment of credit and non-availment of the benefit of Notification No. 12/2003-S.T. The original authorities rejected the claim for want of supporting endorsement or other evidence, but the record included a transporter's certificate indicating admissibility of the exemption for the relevant consignments. In these circumstances, the eligibility issue could not be finally concluded without a fresh factual examination by the original authority and an opportunity to the assessee to place its evidence.
Conclusion: The matter was required to be remanded for fresh consideration of the refund claim in accordance with law, with an effective opportunity of hearing to the assessee.