Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest leviable under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 could be cancelled on the footing that the demand was in the nature of penalty, and whether delay in payment of service tax attracted mandatory interest.
Analysis: The delay in payment of service tax was only for a few days, but the demand raised was specifically one of interest and not penalty. Section 75 provides for interest on delayed payment, and the liability is mandatory once tax is paid belatedly. The Tribunal had proceeded on an incorrect assumption that the amount demanded was penalty, whereas the order of the original authority had already waived penalty and confined the demand to interest.
Conclusion: The demand of interest under Section 75 was rightly recoverable and the cancellation of that demand by the Tribunal was unsustainable. The appeal was allowed and the interest demand was restored.