Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand of interest on differential tax under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act and the Central Sales Tax Act was liable to be sustained, and whether the assessment proceedings required reconsideration in the light of the subsequent revisional order permitting acceptance of C Forms.
Analysis: The assessment orders imposing interest were challenged on the basis that the relevant statutory provisions were not properly applied and that interest would not arise where the differential tax was paid before notice of assessment and demand. The record also showed that in an identical transaction the petitioner had succeeded before the revisional authority in later proceedings, and that authority had permitted the claim on the material then placed before it. Since that order was subsequent to the impugned assessments and the transactions were stated to be identical, the matter required reconsideration by the assessing officer. The petitioner was also entitled to a fresh opportunity, including verification of records and acceptance of C Forms if produced.
Conclusion: The impugned demands were not finally sustained and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration with directions to keep the proceedings in abeyance, follow the later revisional order, grant personal hearing, and redo the assessment in accordance with law.