Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the assessment order was vitiated for want of prior notice and denial of opportunity before passing the order. (ii) Whether reference to section 84 while revising the assessment under section 27 was sustainable.
Issue (i): Whether the assessment order was vitiated for want of prior notice and denial of opportunity before passing the order.
Analysis: The assessment was passed before the notice relied on by the Department was even issued and served. The notice could not cure the prior defect because the impugned order had already been made. The absence of an effective pre-assessment opportunity amounted to a clear breach of natural justice.
Conclusion: The issue is answered in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether reference to section 84 while revising the assessment under section 27 was sustainable.
Analysis: Section 84 could be invoked only in the manner permitted by law after the assessment proceedings were completed, not as a basis for the revisional exercise undertaken in the assessment order. The invocation of section 84 in that context was legally unsustainable and showed an erroneous understanding of the assessing authority's power.
Conclusion: The issue is answered in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessment order was set aside for breach of natural justice and legal error in the exercise of assessment power, and the matter was directed to be reconsidered afresh after due notice and hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment made without an effective pre-decisional opportunity and founded on an impermissible invocation of statutory power is liable to be quashed and remitted for fresh decision in accordance with law.