TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal affirms penalties for aiding fraudulent exports, stresses thorough investigation</h1> <h3>Shri. Ajit Kumar Agarwala, Shri. Rajendra Kanodia, M/s. Terai Overseas Pvt Ltd Versus Commissioner of Customs (Exports), JNCH, Nhava Sheva</h3> Shri. Ajit Kumar Agarwala, Shri. Rajendra Kanodia, M/s. Terai Overseas Pvt Ltd Versus Commissioner of Customs (Exports), JNCH, Nhava Sheva - 2017 (346) ... Issues:Fraudulent claim of drawback in exports; Involvement of appellants in aiding and abetting fraudulent claim of drawback; Violation of principle of natural justice in the adjudication process; Disproportionate penalties imposed on the appellants.Analysis:The judgment pertains to appeals arising from an Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner of Customs, dismissing the appeal and upholding the Order-in-Original. The penalties were imposed on the appellants for their involvement in fraudulent exports and claiming fraudulent drawbacks. The investigation revealed discrepancies in the declared value of exported garments, leading to the fraudulent claim of drawback. The central issue was whether the appellants were actively involved in this fraudulent activity. Statements of various individuals implicated the appellants in aiding and abetting the fraudulent claim of drawback. Despite challenges regarding the cross-examination of witnesses, the Adjudicating authority relied on available evidence to confirm the penalties imposed on the appellants.The appellant argued a violation of the principle of natural justice, emphasizing the lack of cross-examination of key witnesses. However, the Adjudicating authority proceeded with the case based on available evidence and documents. The appellant also contended that the penalties were excessive and disproportionate, as they did not directly benefit from the fraudulent claims. The Revenue, on the other hand, supported the findings of the impugned order, asserting that the appellants played an active role in the fraudulent scheme, justifying the penalties under the Customs Act, 1962.The Tribunal carefully evaluated the submissions and evidence presented. It established that the appellants, along with their company, orchestrated a scheme to fraudulently claim drawbacks on low-valued exports. Detailed analysis revealed the active involvement of the appellants in planning and executing the fraudulent exports through a network of entities. Despite challenges to witness cross-examination, the Tribunal found sufficient corroborative evidence to support the penalties imposed. The judgment upheld the impugned order, dismissing the appeals and affirming the penalties on the appellants for aiding and abetting the fraudulent claim of drawback. The decision was based on the established facts and evidence, concluding that the appellants were actively involved in the fraudulent scheme.Overall, the judgment addresses the complex issues of fraudulent exports, involvement in fraudulent claims of drawbacks, adherence to natural justice principles in adjudication, and the proportionality of penalties imposed in such cases. The Tribunal's decision underscores the importance of thorough investigation, evidence evaluation, and legal principles in determining liabilities in customs-related offenses.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
