Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether approval under Section 80G could be denied on the basis of an alleged breach of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 and whether such breach, by itself, meant that the trust was not genuine.
Analysis: The trust had satisfied all conditions specified in Section 80G(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The mere allegation that funds were borrowed without prior permission under Section 36A(3) of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 did not create an additional disqualification for approval under Section 80G, because the Income-tax Act did not prescribe such a condition. The absence of any proceedings by the Revenue to cancel registration under Section 12AA also supported the position that the trust remained genuine for income-tax purposes.
Conclusion: Denial of approval under Section 80G on the ground of alleged contravention of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 was not justified, and the trust was entitled to approval.
Ratio Decidendi: When a trust satisfies the statutory conditions for approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, approval cannot be refused by importing extraneous conditions from another enactment.