Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the principle of mutuality applied to the assessee so as to sustain the claim under section 80IA and whether the Revenue's challenge based on alleged receipts from a non-member could be entertained.
Analysis: The assessee was a cooperative society formed to provide common effluent treatment facilities to its members. The Tribunal found that the Revenue's allegation of receipts from Dombivili MIDC was not supported by the assessment record and that no such factual foundation had been laid in the assessment proceedings or before the first appellate authority. A fresh factual plea can be entertained only when it gives rise to a question of law arising from facts already on record. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee's case was covered by the jurisdictional High Court's decision on the doctrine of mutuality in the context of a similar effluent treatment association, and the facts were materially similar.
Conclusion: The principle of mutuality applied, the Revenue's new factual ground was rejected, and the assessee's claim was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: A factual ground not borne out by the assessment record cannot be raised as a fresh issue before the Tribunal, and where the receipts originate from members for a common facility used for their benefit, the doctrine of mutuality applies.