Tribunal grants assessee's appeal, reduces disallowance, allows business loss, sets aside interest, upholds capital loss

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal and dismissed the revenue's appeal. The disallowance under Section 14A was reduced, diminution in the value of shares was allowed as a business loss, interest levied under Sections 234B and 234C was set aside, and computation of Long Term Capital Loss was upheld in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reassess the income accordingly.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act.
2. Diminution in the value of shares.
3. Levy of interest under Sections 234B and 234C.
4. Computation of Long Term Capital Loss.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Disallowance under Section 14A
The assessee contested the disallowance of Rs. 1,35,25,433/- under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The assessee received a dividend income of Rs. 7,33,91,985 and had already disallowed interest expenses of Rs. 25,10,473/- under Section 14A. The assessee argued that only the expenditure incurred to earn exempt income should be considered under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The Tribunal noted that the assessee voluntarily disallowed employee welfare expenses of Rs. 1,07,09,710/- and interest expenses of Rs. 25,10,473/-. The remaining expenses were Rs. 3,25,000/- for legal and professional expenses and Rs. 65,629/- for miscellaneous expenses. The Tribunal decided that an additional Rs. 25,000/- could be disallowed as expenditure to earn exempt income, setting aside the CIT(A)'s finding and directing the Assessing Officer to reassess the income accordingly. This issue was decided in favor of the assessee.

Issue 2: Diminution in the Value of Shares
The assessee challenged the disallowance of Rs. 52,31,313/- for the diminution in the value of shares. The assessee treated the investment as stock-in-trade and valued it at market value or cost, whichever was lower, as per accounting standards. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) disallowed this, stating that notional profit or loss could not be assessed as the stock was not sold. The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's decision in United Commercial Bank (240 ITR 355), which allowed such diminution as business loss. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) did not consider this precedent and set aside the CIT(A)'s order, allowing the diminution in the value of shares. This issue was decided in favor of the assessee.

Issue 3: Levy of Interest under Sections 234B and 234C
The assessee challenged the interest levied under Sections 234B (Rs. 14,12,268/-) and 234C (Rs. 64,299/-). Since Issue 2 was decided in favor of the assessee, the consequential result was that the interest levied under these sections was also set aside. This issue was decided in favor of the assessee.

Issue 4: Computation of Long Term Capital Loss
The revenue challenged the CIT(A)'s direction to compute the Long Term Capital Loss on the sale/transfer of shares of IL & FS by determining the cost of acquisition under Section 45(2A) of the Act, read with Circular No.768. The Assessing Officer had disallowed the Long Term Capital Loss of Rs. 7,50,92,618/-, adopting the average cost method. The CIT(A) directed the Assessing Officer to follow Section 45(2A) and Circular No.768, which prescribes the FIFO method for determining the cost of acquisition and period of holding. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, finding no unjustifiable grounds to interfere. This issue was decided in favor of the assessee and against the revenue.

Conclusion:
The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the appeal of the revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal's order was pronounced in the open court on 26th August 2016.

---