Court Upholds Assessment Order Despite Lack of Notice: Importance of Timely Appeals

The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal for assessing liability without issuing a notice under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962. The petitioner failed to file an appeal within the prescribed time frame despite being aware of the assessment order. The Court held that the non-issuance of a notice did not invalidate the proceedings entirely and emphasized the availability of a statutory remedy through an appeal to the Division Bench under Section 130 of the Customs Act, which the petitioner did not pursue within the specified period. Consequently, the Court found no merit in the writ petition and dismissed it without costs.

---

---

Issues:
Assessment of liability without notice under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962; Failure to file appeal within prescribed time period; Jurisdiction of the assessing officer; Availability of alternative statutory remedy; Writ of certiorari under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Analysis:
The petitioner challenged an order by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal for assessing liability without issuing a notice under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962. The petitioner contended that the customs authorities acted unilaterally without notice, leading to the dismissal of the subsequent appeal due to missed deadlines. The petitioner argued that a writ of certiorari should be issued citing AIR 1986 SC 85 (State of U.P. Vs. Md. Nooh) to rectify errors or irregularities by the tribunal.

The customs authorities, on the other hand, argued that the order was appealable to the Division Bench under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962. They emphasized that the petitioner failed to utilize the statutory remedy within the specified time frame, suggesting that the writ Court should not intervene. The assessing officer's jurisdiction was also questioned, with the authorities asserting that the alleged irregularity did not warrant interference.

The Court considered both sides' arguments and found that the petitioner did not file an appeal within the prescribed time, despite being aware of the assessment order. It was noted that the non-issuance of a notice under Section 28 did not invalidate the proceedings entirely. The Court highlighted that the petitioner had the opportunity to rectify any irregularities through a statutory appeal, which was not pursued within the stipulated period.

Referring to Md. Nooh case, the Court clarified that a writ is maintainable only if the tribunal acts with a patent lack of jurisdiction or adopts a procedure so illegal that it leaves an indelible mark of infirmity. Since the petitioner had the right to appeal to the Division Bench under Section 130 of the Customs Act, and failed to do so without explanation, the Court found no merit in the writ petition and dismissed it, with no costs imposed.

---