Principal-to-principal sale basis defeated excise duty enhancement from imported raw material valuation

Differential central excise duty on finished goods was found unsustainable because the relationship between the assessee and the buyer was on a principal-to-principal commercial basis, not that of job worker and principal manufacturer. The Tribunal treated earlier findings as decisive that vendor nomination, advance funding for procurement, and supply of equipment did not change the character of the transaction. On that footing, the enhanced customs value of imported raw materials was not required to be added automatically to the assessable value of the finished goods, and the duty demand was set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether the demand of differential central excise duty could be sustained on the footing that the appellant was a job worker and that the enhanced customs value of imported raw materials had to be added to the assessable value of the finished goods.

Analysis: The Tribunal noted that in the appellant's own earlier case it had already been held that the relationship between the appellant and the buyer was not one of job worker and principal manufacturer, but a commercial transaction on principal-to-principal basis. The earlier decision also found that merely because the buyer had indicated vendors, advanced money for procurement, or provided equipment, the nature of the transaction did not change. On that basis, the Tribunal accepted that the sale prices were fixed commercially and that the increased import value of raw materials did not automatically alter the assessable value for excise duty purposes.

Conclusion: The demand of differential duty was held to be unsustainable and the impugned order was set aside in favour of the assessee.

---