Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of service tax, interest and penalties demanded on amounts received for laying pipelines for water supply, and whether such work could be brought within the category of erection, commissioning or installation under Section 65(39a) of the Finance Act, 1994.
Analysis: The demand was raised on the footing that the pipeline-laying activity constituted erection, commissioning or installation of a plant. The appellants relied on the contention that, for the period in question, the department could not vivisect a works contract so as to levy service tax on any part of the work. On the material placed before the Tribunal, a prima facie case was found in favour of the appellants against the demand.
Outcome: Pre-deposit was waived and recovery of service tax, interest and penalties was stayed.