Customs Duty: Invoice Value Ruled Valid, Excludes Mark/License Fees

The Authority ruled in favor of the applicant, determining that the value on the invoice from third-party manufacturers constitutes the Transaction Value for Customs Duty. The Trade Mark/License Fee and Sales and Business Support Fee paid to the parent company were not considered as payments to be included in the Transaction Value for Customs Duty purposes.

---

---

Issues:
1. Determination of Transaction Value for Customs Duty.
2. Inclusion of Trade Mark/License Fee in Transaction Value for Customs Duty.
3. Inclusion of Sales and Business Support Fee in Transaction Value for Customs Duty.

Issue 1: Determination of Transaction Value for Customs Duty

The case involved an Indian subsidiary of a global brand setting up single brand retail trading in India. The subsidiary proposed to import goods from overseas third-party manufacturers and sell them in India under the parent company's brand. The applicant sought clarification on whether the value on the invoice from third-party manufacturers constitutes the Transaction Value for Customs Duty. The Revenue argued that the payment to third-party manufacturers was the sole consideration for the sale transaction, and no other payments were made. The Revenue contended that the applicant did not qualify as a related entity with the manufacturers, and the Trademark License fee paid to the parent company was not a condition of sale. The Authority ruled that the value on the invoice from third-party manufacturers is the Transaction Value for Customs Duty.

Issue 2: Inclusion of Trade Mark/License Fee in Transaction Value for Customs Duty

The applicant also questioned whether the Trade Mark/License Fee paid to the parent company should be added to the Transaction Value for Customs Duty. The Revenue argued that the License fee was for post-importation activities and not a condition of sale between the applicant and manufacturers. The Revenue emphasized that the payment should be made to the seller for inclusion in Transaction Value. The Authority ruled that the Trade Mark/License Fee did not qualify as a payment under the relevant Rule and should not be added to the Transaction Value for Customs Duty.

Issue 3: Inclusion of Sales and Business Support Fee in Transaction Value for Customs Duty

Lastly, the applicant inquired about including the Sales and Business Support Fee paid to the parent company in the Transaction Value for Customs Duty. The Revenue contended that this fee was also not a condition of sale between the applicant and manufacturers. The Authority agreed with the Revenue's argument that the Sales and Business Support Fee did not qualify as a payment under the relevant Rule and should not be added to the Transaction Value for Customs Duty.

In conclusion, the Authority ruled in favor of the applicant regarding the Transaction Value determination for Customs Duty and clarified that both the Trade Mark/License Fee and the Sales and Business Support Fee should not be included in the Transaction Value for Customs Duty purposes.

---