Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty was sustainable when the assessee had paid the duty and interest before issuance of the show-cause notice and the case fell within the scope of Section 11A(2B) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The duty liability and interest had been discharged by the assessee on its own before the show-cause notice was issued, and the returns filed by it disclosed the payments. In the absence of a finding of intention to evade duty, the pre-notice voluntary payment attracted the statutory protection under Section 11A(2B). On these facts, the penalty provisions invoked under Rule 25 and Section 11AC could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The penalty was rightly set aside and no penalty was payable against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where duty and interest are paid voluntarily before issuance of the show-cause notice and there is no finding of intent to evade duty, penalty is not leviable.