Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, together with interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, were sustainable when the duty had been discharged before issuance of the show cause notice in the light of Section 11A(2B) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The duty demand had already been paid before the show cause notice was issued. In view of the amendment to Section 11A(2B) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the Larger Bench decision relied upon, where duty is paid before issuance of notice, the statutory basis for invoking penalty and interest does not survive. On that footing, the penalty under Rule 25 and Section 11AC could not be sustained.
Conclusion: Penalty and interest were not leviable, and the appeal succeeded.