Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2016 (8) TMI 1047 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rulings on deductions, disallowances, and remand decisions in recent tax appeal case. The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. The disallowance of Product Development Expenditure was upheld, ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal rulings on deductions, disallowances, and remand decisions in recent tax appeal case.

                          The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. The disallowance of Product Development Expenditure was upheld, while the deduction under section 10AA on receipts from M/s. Akorn Inc., USA was disallowed. Exclusion of freight and insurance from total turnover for computing deductions under sections 10B and 10AA was upheld. The issue of disallowance of expenditure under section 14A was remanded back to the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal's decisions on provisions for leave encashment, donations, license fees for Microsoft software, foreign travel expenses, PMS fees, and reclassification of assets were in favor of the assessee.




                          Issues Involved:

                          1. Disallowance of Product Development Expenditure.
                          2. Disallowance of deduction u/s. 10AA on receipts from M/s. Akorn Inc., USA.
                          3. Exclusion of freight and insurance from total turnover while computing deduction u/s. 10B and 10AA.
                          4. Disallowance of expenditure u/s. 14A.
                          5. Provision for leave encashment.
                          6. Donations to Manjari Grampanchayat.
                          7. Expenditure towards license fees for Microsoft software.
                          8. Foreign Travel expenses of employees.
                          9. Disallowance of PMS fees.
                          10. Re-classification of 'Plant and Machinery' items as 'Furniture and Fixtures'.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Disallowance of Product Development Expenditure:
                          The assessee claimed Product Development Expenses of Rs. 19,96,93,543/- as revenue expenditure in the revised return, which was initially capitalized in the books. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)'s decision, stating that the nature of the expenditure (salaries, testing charges, raw materials, etc.) was revenue in nature, despite the accounting treatment in the books. Reliance was placed on precedents that accounting entries are not conclusive in determining the nature of expenditure.

                          2. Disallowance of deduction u/s. 10AA on receipts from M/s. Akorn Inc., USA:
                          The assessee received Rs. 3,87,57,400/- from M/s. Akorn Inc., USA for exclusive marketing rights and claimed it as revenue for deduction u/s. 10AA. The Tribunal found no direct nexus between the receipts and the export of products, thus disallowing the deduction. The Supreme Court's interpretation of 'derived from' being narrower than 'attributable to' was applied.

                          3. Exclusion of freight and insurance from total turnover while computing deduction u/s. 10B and 10AA:
                          The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of freight and insurance from both export turnover and total turnover for computing deductions u/s. 10B and 10AA, following the Special Bench decision in ITO Vs. Sak Soft Ltd. and the Bombay High Court's decision in Gem Plus Jewellery India Ltd.

                          4. Disallowance of expenditure u/s. 14A:
                          The Tribunal remanded the issue back to the Assessing Officer to verify if interest-bearing funds were used for investments. The decision was to be made in light of the Bombay High Court's ruling in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Reliance Utilities and Power Ltd.

                          5. Provision for leave encashment:
                          The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal, following its own earlier decision and the precedents set by the Calcutta High Court in Exide Industries Ltd. and the Bombay High Court in Universal Medicare Private Limited, which ruled against the assessee.

                          6. Donations to Manjari Grampanchayat:
                          The Tribunal allowed the deduction of Rs. 15,00,000/- contributed for water supply facilities, considering it as an expenditure under corporate social responsibility, benefiting the company's employees and the general public, following its earlier decision in the assessee's own case.

                          7. Expenditure towards license fees for Microsoft software:
                          The Tribunal held that the expenditure on Microsoft XP and Office 2007 software was revenue in nature due to the necessity of regular upgrades, aligning with the Delhi High Court's decision in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. G.E. Capital Services Ltd.

                          8. Foreign Travel expenses of employees:
                          The Tribunal upheld the capitalization of foreign travel expenses of Rs. 25,77,069/- incurred for finalizing the purchase of machinery, consistent with its earlier decisions in the assessee's own case.

                          9. Disallowance of PMS fees:
                          The Tribunal allowed the deduction of PMS fees of Rs. 75,08,253/- from capital gains, following its own decision in the assessee's earlier appeal and the precedent set in KRA Holding & Trading (P) Ltd. Vs. DCIT.

                          10. Re-classification of 'Plant and Machinery' items as 'Furniture and Fixtures':
                          The Tribunal reclassified certain assets used in the laboratory (e.g., stainless steel tables, stools) as 'Plant and Machinery' based on the functional test, following its earlier decision in the assessee's own case.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal and dismissed the Revenue's appeal, providing detailed reasons for each issue based on legal precedents and the specific facts of the case.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found