Writ relief against surprise inspection materials refused, with jurisdictional objections left open for assessment proceedings.

A writ of certiorari was not considered the proper remedy to quash the inspection report, seizure mahazar or statement recorded during a surprise inspection at this stage. The court noted that the records were seized from the business premises and that the enforcement officials claimed delegated authority under the statutory scheme, so it declined to interfere in writ jurisdiction. Any dispute over the correctness or effect of the recorded statement was left to be raised before the assessing officer, who was not to proceed mechanically on that statement alone. The jurisdictional objection to the inspection proceedings was not finally decided and remained open for assessment proceedings.

---

---

Issues: Whether the inspection report, seizure mahazar and statement recorded during surprise inspection could be quashed in writ jurisdiction, and whether the jurisdictional objection to the inspection proceedings could be decided at this stage.

Analysis: The petitioner challenged the authority of the enforcement officials to conduct the surprise inspection, record statements and seize records. The Court held that a writ of certiorari was not the proper course to quash the inspection report or the statement at this stage. Since the records were seized from the petitioner's place of business and the respondents asserted delegation of authority under the statutory scheme, the Court declined to interfere. It was also observed that any grievance regarding the correctness or effect of the statement could be raised before the assessing officer, who is not to be guided solely by the enforcement statement while completing assessment. The jurisdictional objection was therefore not finally decided and was left open for consideration in assessment proceedings.

Conclusion: The challenge to quash the inspection proceedings was rejected at this stage, and the jurisdictional issue was left open to be urged before the assessing officer.

---