Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rubberised coir products, including mattresses and pillows manufactured using coir fibre, latex gum and polyurethane foam, were classifiable under Item 24 of Part C of the First Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 at 5% or under Item 15 of Part E at 12%.
Analysis: The appellate authority and the Tribunal concurrently found, on examination of the samples and manufacturing materials, that the goods were rubberised coir products and not foam rubber products. They held that the mere use of latex gum in binding coir fibre did not change the character of the product, and relied on the relevant schedule entry and the earlier judicial view treating rubberised coir products as falling within Item 24 of Part C. The Court found no strong material to disturb these concurrent factual findings and held that no substantial question of law arose for interference.
Conclusion: The classification under Item 24 of Part C at 5% was upheld and the challenge by the Revenue failed.