Appellate Tribunal Corrects Errors in Order: 'Penalty' to 'Redemption Fine' The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI allowed the revenue's miscellaneous application for rectification of mistakes in the final order. Three ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellate Tribunal Corrects Errors in Order: "Penalty" to "Redemption Fine"
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI allowed the revenue's miscellaneous application for rectification of mistakes in the final order. Three typographic errors were corrected without affecting the decision's substance, such as changing "penalty" to "redemption fine" and "for" to "from" in the order.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI allowed the revenue's miscellaneous application for rectification of mistakes in the final order. Three errors were identified as typographic mistakes without impacting the decision's merits. Rectifications included substituting "penalty" for "redemption fine" and changing "for" to "from" in the final order.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.