Prior decision in assessee's own case defeated Business Auxiliary Services tax demand and penalty challenge.

Service tax demand and penalty for Business Auxiliary Services were held unsustainable because the same issue had already been decided in the assessee's favour in its own earlier case. The lower appellate authority followed that prior final order, and the Tribunal found no merit in the revenue's challenge. The Commissioner (Appeals)' order was therefore upheld, the revenue's appeal was rejected, and the stay application was consequentially dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the demand of service tax and penalty for Business Auxiliary Services was sustainable in view of the Tribunal's earlier decision in the assessee's own case.

Analysis: The demand of service tax was raised on the footing that the respondent was providing Business Auxiliary Services. The lower appellate authority had allowed the appeal by following the Tribunal's earlier final order in the respondent's own case. Since the same issue had already been decided in favour of the respondent, there was no merit in the revenue's challenge.

Conclusion: The order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was upheld and the revenue's appeal was rejected, with consequential rejection of the stay application.

---