Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether capital gains arising from the sale of immovable property situated in Sri Lanka were taxable in India in the hands of an assessee who was a resident of India under the Act but claimed treaty protection under the India-Sri Lanka DTAA.
Analysis: The assessee was treated as a resident in India under Section 6 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, but the question remained whether, for treaty purposes, her residence was to be determined under Article 4 of the DTAA. The Tribunal examined the place of permanent home, the centre of vital interests, and habitual abode, and concluded on the facts that the assessee's personal and economic ties had shifted to India after marriage, so she remained a resident of India under the treaty as well. The Tribunal then applied Article 13 of the DTAA to gains from alienation of immovable property situated in Sri Lanka and held that such gains were taxable in Sri Lanka. It further considered Notification No. 91 of 2008 issued under Section 90(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and treated the notification as clarificatory in nature for the manner of granting relief and avoiding double taxation.
Conclusion: The capital gains on sale of the Sri Lankan immovable property were held to be taxable in Sri Lanka, with relief to be granted in India in accordance with the DTAA and the notification; the assessee's appeal was allowed.