Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2016 (7) TMI 269 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        ITAT Kolkata grants relief on profit determination, disallowances & directs removal of certain additions The ITAT Kolkata partially allowed the appeals challenging assessment procedures, profit determination, and disallowances. The Tribunal agreed with the ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                            Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                              ITAT Kolkata grants relief on profit determination, disallowances & directs removal of certain additions

                              The ITAT Kolkata partially allowed the appeals challenging assessment procedures, profit determination, and disallowances. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant on profit determination and disallowances based on guesswork, directing the AO to remove certain additions related to undisclosed sources. An issue was remitted for further examination regarding turnover and cash deposits. Relief was granted to the appellant on various disputed matters.




                              Issues involved:
                              1. Initiation and completion of assessment procedures
                              2. Validity of appeal completion without reasonable opportunity
                              3. Profit determination based on percentage
                              4. Disallowance of security deposit
                              5. Disallowance of advertisement expenses
                              6. Disallowance of difference in bank balance and job charges
                              7. Disallowance of sundry creditors
                              8. Disallowance of purchase amount
                              9. Addition on account of low drawings
                              10. Contradictory profit determination

                              Issue 1: Initiation and completion of assessment procedures
                              The appeals challenged the initiation and completion of assessment procedures as bad in law and void ab initio. The appellant argued that the proceedings were flawed, and the CIT's ex parte completion without providing a reasonable opportunity was unjust. The issues were taken up together due to their identical nature.

                              Issue 2: Profit determination based on percentage
                              The appellant contested the profit determination based on guesswork, specifically challenging the method of determining profit on a percentage basis. The appellant argued that the percentage-based calculation was arbitrary and lacked a factual basis.

                              Issue 3: Disallowance of security deposit
                              The appellant objected to the disallowance of a security deposit based on guesswork. The appellant argued that the security deposit was not adequately accounted for, leading to an unjust disallowance.

                              Issue 4: Disallowance of advertisement expenses
                              The appellant disputed the disallowance of expenses related to advertisements, claiming that the disallowance was unjustified and lacked a valid basis.

                              Issue 5: Disallowance of difference in bank balance and job charges
                              The appellant challenged the disallowance of the difference in bank balance and job charges, arguing that the disallowance was arbitrary and not supported by sufficient evidence.

                              Issue 6: Disallowance of sundry creditors
                              The appellant contested the disallowance of sundry creditors, claiming that the disallowance was based on guesswork and lacked proper justification.

                              Issue 7: Disallowance of purchase amount
                              The appellant objected to the disallowance of a specific purchase amount, arguing that the disallowance was arbitrary and not adequately explained.

                              Issue 8: Addition on account of low drawings
                              The appellant disputed an addition made on account of low drawings, arguing that the addition was based on estimation without a valid basis.

                              Issue 9: Contradictory profit determination
                              The appellant raised concerns about a contradictory profit determination where certain expenditures were added back after profit calculation, leading to inconsistencies and challenging the validity of the assessment.

                              Judgment Summary:
                              The ITAT Kolkata addressed multiple issues raised by the appellant related to assessment procedures, profit determination, disallowances, and additions. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's arguments regarding the profit determination and disallowances based on guesswork. It directed the AO to delete certain additions made towards undisclosed sources, emphasizing that the profit from undisclosed business covered various aspects and should not be subject to separate additions. The Tribunal also set aside an issue for further examination by the AO to compare turnover disclosed by the appellant with cash deposits, highlighting the need for a proper assessment based on factual evidence. The appeals were partly allowed and allowed for statistical purposes, providing relief to the appellant on several contested issues.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found