Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the acquittal was justified on the ground that the search and seizure were vitiated by non-compliance with the mandatory requirements of Section 42 and by the inapplicability of Section 43 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Analysis: Prior information had been received and reduced into writing, and the case was therefore governed by Section 42. The record showed a mismatch between the information recorded and the information forwarded to the superior officer, and no reasons for conducting a night search were recorded. The vehicle was a private jeep and there was no reliable material to show that it was a public conveyance or that it had any permit for passenger transport, so Section 43 did not apply. In these circumstances, the safeguards under Section 42 were mandatory and their breach materially affected the prosecution case. The Court also noted that the line of authorities under the Act treats these safeguards as essential protections against unlawful search and seizure.
Conclusion: The acquittal was correctly upheld because the mandatory requirements of Section 42 were not complied with and Section 43 was not attracted.
Final Conclusion: The conviction could not be restored, and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where search and seizure under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 are based on prior information, the statutory safeguards under Section 42 are mandatory, and if the place searched is not shown to be a public conveyance or other public place within Section 43, non-compliance with Section 42 vitiates the prosecution case.