Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the seizure from a private vehicle parked on a public road was governed by Section 42 or Section 43 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, and whether total non-compliance with Section 42 entitled the appellants to acquittal.
Analysis: The vehicle was found to be a private vehicle and not a public conveyance. On that basis, the expression "public place" in Section 43 did not cover the search, and the search and seizure were held to fall within Section 42. The record showed admitted total non-compliance with the requirements of Section 42. The governing principle applied was that while delayed compliance may be acceptable in an emergent situation, total non-compliance with Section 42 is impermissible.
Conclusion: The case was held to be governed by Section 42, the breach was found to be total, and the appellants were entitled to acquittal.