Revisional jurisdiction cannot be used for refund admissibility disputes when the statutory appellate remedy applies.

Revision under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was not available where the impugned order concerned admissibility of refund under Section 11B read with Section 3 of the Jute Manufacturers Cess Act, 1983. The statutory scheme was examined alongside the appellate remedy under Section 35B(1), and the refund dispute over Jute Cess and allied cesses was found to fall outside the revisional jurisdiction invoked. The revision application was therefore beyond jurisdiction and not maintainable, leaving the party to pursue the appropriate appellate forum if so advised.

---

---

Issues: Whether the revision application under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was maintainable when the impugned order related to admissibility of refund under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 3 of the Jute Manufacturers Cess Act, 1983.

Analysis: The dispute before the authorities was about refund of Jute Cess and allied cesses paid on supplies from a DTA unit to an SEZ unit. The impugned order was passed in a refund matter and the Government examined the statutory scheme governing revisional jurisdiction under Section 35EE and the appellate remedy under Section 35B(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It found that the subject matter did not fall within the class of orders for which revision lay to the Central Government under Section 35EE, because the controversy was one on refund admissibility and was outside the revisional channel invoked by the applicant.

Conclusion: The revision application was held to be beyond jurisdiction and not maintainable.

Final Conclusion: The proceeding ended at the threshold on maintainability, leaving the refund dispute to be pursued, if so advised, before the appropriate appellate forum.

Ratio Decidendi: A revision under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is not maintainable where the impugned order falls within the category of matters excluded from revisional jurisdiction and is instead exigible to the statutory appellate remedy.

---