Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand recovery should remain stayed during pendency of the appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), subject to a partial deposit by the assessee, and whether the appellate authority should be directed to hear the appeal expeditiously.
Analysis: The petition was disposed of by working out an interim arrangement under which the assessee was required to deposit Rs. 1 crore within a stipulated time after the accounts were defreezed. The balance demand was kept in abeyance till disposal of the appeal and for a further period thereafter. The appellate authority was also directed to hear the pending appeal expeditiously after giving due opportunity to the appellant.
Conclusion: The assessee obtained protection against coercive recovery of the balance demand, subject to the stipulated deposit, and the appellate proceedings were directed to be decided expeditiously.