Income-tax prosecution cannot survive when the assessment foundation is deleted in appeal and the complaint loses its basis.

Criminal prosecution for concealment of income under the Income-tax Act could not be sustained once the assessment order forming its sole foundation was set aside in appeal. The alleged undisclosed income came from material found during search, but the later appellate deletion of that addition removed the basis of the complaint. In those circumstances, continuation of the prosecution was treated as abuse of process, and the High Court held that inherent power under Section 482 CrPC could be used to secure the ends of justice by quashing the proceeding.

---

---

Issues: Whether criminal prosecution for concealment of income under the Income-tax Act could be quashed after the assessment order forming its basis was set aside in appeal.

Analysis: The prosecution was founded on alleged undisclosed income reflected in a diary recovered during search and seizure. The assessment order including that extra income was later deleted in appeal, thereby removing the sole foundation of the complaint. When the very basis of the criminal case no longer survives, continuation of the prosecution amounts to abuse of the process of court. The inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 can be invoked to prevent such abuse and secure the ends of justice.

Conclusion: The criminal prosecution was liable to be quashed and was quashed in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: Once the assessment basis supporting the complaint was deleted in appeal, the connected prosecution under the Income-tax Act could not be sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the foundational assessment giving rise to prosecution under the Income-tax Act is set aside, the criminal proceeding based solely on that assessment cannot continue and may be quashed as an abuse of process.

---