Court Sanctions Demerger Scheme under Companies Act Sections 391-394, 100-104

The court granted sanction for a scheme of arrangement involving the demerger of an undertaking under Sections 391 to 394 and Sections 100 to 104 read with Section 52 of the Companies Act. The court found jurisdiction to entertain the petition as both companies' registered offices were in Bhopal. Compliance was ensured through the provision of necessary details, approval resolutions, and absence of pending proceedings. Approval of the scheme was obtained from shareholders, creditors, Regional Director, and Official Liquidator. Sanction was granted due to compliance and absence of objections, with directions given for share capital reduction and statutory compliance.

---

---

Issues:
1. Jurisdiction of the court to entertain the petition under Sections 391 to 394 and Sections 100 to 104 read with Section 52 of the Companies Act.
2. Compliance with formalities and requirements of law by the petitioner companies.
3. Approval of the scheme of arrangement by shareholders, creditors, Regional Director, and Official Liquidator.
4. Grant of sanction to the scheme of arrangement under relevant sections of the Companies Act.
5. Directions regarding reduction of share capital, compliance with statutory requirements, and filing of necessary documents.

Jurisdiction of the Court:
The petition was filed under Sections 391 to 394 and Sections 100 to 104 read with Section 52 of the Companies Act, seeking sanction for a scheme of arrangement involving the demerger of an undertaking. The petitioner contended that both companies' registered offices were in Bhopal, establishing the court's jurisdiction to entertain the petition.

Compliance with Formalities:
The petitioner provided necessary details of incorporation, capital structure, and financial statements of the companies. Resolutions approving the scheme were passed by the respective Boards of Directors. No pending proceedings under relevant sections of the Companies Act were reported, ensuring compliance with legal requirements.

Approval of the Scheme:
Previous directions were sought and granted to dispense with the requirement of convening meetings of shareholders and creditors. Reports were filed by the Regional Director and Official Liquidator, indicating no objections to the scheme. Shareholders and creditors approved the scheme, leading to the grant of sanction by the court under the applicable provisions of the Companies Act.

Grant of Sanction:
Considering the absence of objections and the compliance with procedural formalities, the court granted sanction to the scheme of arrangement under Sections 391 to 394 and 100 to 103 of the Companies Act, 1956, along with Section 52 of the Companies Act, 2013. The approved scheme became a part of the court's order.

Directions and Compliance:
The court directed the Demerged Company to reduce its share capital as per the scheme, allowing the use of the security premium account for this purpose. Both petitioner companies were instructed to comply with statutory requirements and file necessary documents with the Registrar of Companies and Stamp authorities. Additionally, a specified sum was to be paid to the counsels for the Regional Director and Official Liquidator.

This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key legal aspects, procedural steps, and compliance requirements involved in the approval and sanctioning of the scheme of arrangement by the court.

---