Modvat credit cannot be denied as a penalty after corrected depreciation claim withdrawal and rectification

An assessee that had initially claimed both depreciation on machinery duty component and Modvat credit, but later withdrew the depreciation claim through revised returns and rectification, could not be denied Modvat credit on that basis. The court treated the attempted denial as punitive because the inconsistency had been corrected and the object of Modvat credit is not to penalise a rectified mistake. It also noted that entitlement to Modvat credit from a later date had been recognised by the original authority and could not be disturbed adversely without a corresponding departmental challenge. The recovery demand was therefore held unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee, having initially availed both depreciation under the Income-tax Act and Modvat credit on the duty component of machinery but later giving up the depreciation through revised returns and rectification proceedings, could still be denied Modvat credit and subjected to recovery, interest and penalty.

Analysis: The assessee had obtained two mutually inconsistent fiscal benefits on the same duty component. After the mistake was detected, it withdrew the depreciation claim through rectification/revised returns, and the depreciation benefit was ultimately not retained except for one assessment year. The denial of Modvat credit in these circumstances was held to be punitive, since the object of Modvat credit is not to penalise an assessee after the error has been corrected. It was also noted that the original authority itself had recognised entitlement to Modvat credit from a later date, and that portion could not have been altered adversely in the absence of a corresponding departmental challenge.

Conclusion: The denial of Modvat credit was unsustainable. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee, and the recovery demand could not be upheld in the manner done by the Tribunal.

---